20190930
[begin transmission]
It truly is a wondrous occurrence, Lee Enfield.
To have you so casually walk into my life when you did. Even if it was more of a stumble.
What's even more miraculous is that you were not off-put by my initial belligerence.
You were patient enough to wait through it and allow me to reveal myself in my own time.
Not only in my own time, but in my own way as well. No one 'gets' me quite like you.
Rarely do I have to explain myself nor do I have to apologize for being myself to you.
I credit that to us holding a lot of the same values, therefore we hold a similar understanding of the world.
And when we do disagree, I don't feel any apprehensions about addressing it with you.
It's your discipline and intelligence, I think, that enables us to be so open with each other.
Am I narcissistically complimenting myself through you? Because we're so similar?
In a way, sure. But that isn't the intent here, rather this writing is in recognition of the triumph of you and us.
A timeless, classic, indomitable partnership in the making.
I have to wonder though, had we met through different circumstances,
Would the outcome have remained the same?
[end transmission]
20190916
[begin transmission 3/3]
------- Finally...Postmodern Art -------
So, with Modern art being indeterminate in what is the true essence of art, we move into the 1950s - 1990s. It is here that Postmodernism began to gain traction, continuing with the more cynical and strange elements that the preceding Modernism had introduced into the art world, and adding a few new trends of it's own. One of these trends is, in a sense, a continuation of the reductionist developments of Modernism. That is, the targeting of stylistic or medium integrity; as such techniques along the likes of collage (using pieces of other things to make a new thing), décollage (removing pieces of one thing to make a new thing), and bricolage (using different mediums in one piece) began to take prominence. The HSBC HQ building in Hong Kong (designed by Norman Foster) is, in my estimation, the coolest example of this development. Just look at it: the building seems more akin to a battleship rather than a proper skyscraper. The steel modules showcased in its construction were made by ship builders in Glasgow; part of the steel frame on the front of the building resemble twin ladders reaching up to the bridge of a ship; there even appears to be a set of twin anti-aircraft guns at the very top for godsakes! I also adore the fact that they're aimed at the competition's (the Bank of China) building.
![]() |
HSBC HQ, Hong Kong designed by Norman Foster. |
Another trend that caught on in Postmodernist art is the usage of ironic, self-referential content. The aforementioned Erased de Kooning Drawing can be an example of this development, but so can Marcel Duchamp's L.H.O.O.Q. This Duchamp readymade features a postcard depicting da Vinci's Mona Lisa, only with a beard and moustache penciled in. On the performance art side of things, we have Niki de Saint Phalle reproducing the classic Venus de Milo...and promptly filling it full of lead with a .22 caliber rifle. Concealed bags of red and black paint in the reproduction led to the illusion of bloodshed from Venus. It is crucial to recognize that, in pursuing this ironic, self-referential content theme, artists engaged in destruction. This is quite a distinct development from the Modernist project of analyzing and reducing art to come to it's fundamental truth. At least that process still required some sort of novel addition to the canvas, some degree of technical skill, and art was still seen as something to value. In Postmodernist works, the name of the game appears to be taking an existing work or artistic theme and subtracting from it, making it less in some manner, be it through physical violation or esteem degradation through mockery. No clearer is that last sentiment made than by Piero Manzoni's Artist's Shit.
![]() |
L.H.O.O.Q. by Marcel Duchamp |
...This brought me pause when I first learned about it. But essentially Manzoni canned 90 tins of his own feces. Each tin contains 30g of "Freshly preserved produced and tinned" fecal matter. Perhaps even more contemptible is the fact that one of these tins managed to fetch at auction a little over $300k in 2016. Suffice to say, by Manzoni's time, art had lost all reverence and could be reduced to literal shit.
![]() |
Artist's Shit by Piero Manzoni. |
I think that it's these two developments, the violation of stylistic integrity (which invited more varied mediums for art to manifest) and the inclusion of ironic, self-referential content (which lead to an artistic attitude of irreverence and destruction) that formed an ethos of 'shock, disgust, or confuse' among Postmodern artists. Although Pop Team Epic keeps the shock and disgust (along with the preoccupation with bodily waste, thankfully) to a minimum, it still clearly embodies the violation of stylistic integrity and inclusion of ironic, self-referential content.
------- Let's Pop! -------
Of the number of stylistic integrity violations that occur within season one's 12 episode run, the ones that immediately come to mind would have to be the JAPON MiGNON, Bobunemimimmi, and Pop Team 8-Bit segments. These segments each showcase different animation styles: fluid/crisp 2D animation, choppy/haphazard hand-drawn 2D animation, and pixel art animation respectively. Aside from these 'traditional' 2D styles of animation, there are also quite a few live-action sections such as the stop motion music video UchoPeople segments, or the legendary performance art segment of 'Hellshake Yano". Now then, one could consider that none of these styles are violations of the medium in and of themselves; afterall, they're all still forms of animation nonetheless. Though that might be true, it is important to keep in mind the grander context of the show. Your typical PTE episode features around 10-15 segments each episode (double that if you count the alternate voice acting reel as unique segments); it is nearly guaranteed that you'll encounter at the minimum three unique art styles and mediums over the course of twenty minutes. Thus, an episode is much more akin to a video form of bricolage, utilizing mixed media in a single work. This is not something typical of your run-of-the-mill anime that obviously tends to stick to the 2D and drawn animation style, adhering to a single medium.
![]() |
JAPON MiGNON |
![]() |
Bobunemimimmi |
![]() |
UchoPeople |
![]() |
Hellshake Yano |
Distinguishing it further from traditional anime, as stated before, an episode of PTE easily features 10+ segments, and most of these last mere seconds. This is due in part to the nature of the source material: PTE was originally a yonkoma manga (four panel comic, arranged vertically). While there are several anime that are based off of yonkoma, none of them (at least, to my knowledge) strictly adhere to such a shortly segmented presentation. All twelve episodes of season one comprise of these short segments, every last one. This very fact is what enables PTE to use and abuse non-sequitur humor quite effectively, much to the delight or annoyance of its audience. Love it or hate it, it is one of the myriad of ways that the series goes on to flout the standard dramatic form of anime or even plot-involved media in general. You'd be very hard-pressed to find the clear intro, rise, climax, fall, and dénouement in any unitary PTE segment or episode. However, I hesitate in saying that this holds true for the season as a whole, as the very final episode ties back to the first, shoehorning what could be construed as a coherent, overarching plot in the process. Though, yet again, this is another method by which PTE subverts expectations, by releasing a discordant line-up of chaotic, independent episodes only to decide at the 11th hour to suddenly start forming any sense of continuity and direction.
Full disclosure: I'm not keen on contemporary pop culture. I don't keep current on whatever movie, television program, song, book, or video game happens to be in vogue at the moment. I find that it's simply too much to stay on top of and only half of it is of any personal interest to me anyway. But I'd be awfully remiss if I didn't fail to mention the several hundreds of pop culture references PTE manages to make in it's first season. Here's a short sample list of what I could personally identify:
- Nods to Rurouni Kenshin, Pokemon, Skyrim, Super Marios Bros. in episode 01.
- References to Street Fighter, Fantasy Zone, Gradius, and Akira in episode 03.
- Both the films Cool Runnings and Top Gun are referenced, and a cover of Earth, Wind & Fire's Let's Groove is included in episode 04.
- The AMAZING ode to classic Japanese yakuza films of the 1970s, in episode 08.
- References to The Shining and Ju-on in episode 11.
It is also worthy to note that a large portion of the references are things that only Japanese audiences would catch, so even a Westerner keener than I when it comes to pop culture would in all likelihood fail to catch a substantial amount of references. The reason why I am mentioning the abundance of pop culture references in PTE is because it is in line with the Postmodernist trend of being self-referential. While most of these references are indeed meant to pay homage to previous great works, some of them are used satirically to great effect; and as we all know satire invites some form of commentary. The most obvious and probably my favorite example of this is the running gag of the Hoshiiro Girl Drop anime series. Essentially, PTE went satirical right out of the gate; the first episode disguises itself as a light-hearted idol/comedy/romance anime called Hoshiiro Girl Drop, complete with a proper OP segment. At the title card Popuko tears into the screen and the episode begins in earnest. However, at the conclusion of every episode a preview segment for Hoshiiro Girl Drop occurs, endearingly imploring the audience to "Fall in love again next week!".
![]() |
Hoshiiro Girldrop |
"Hoshiiro Girl Drop Final Episode 'Sosogu and Daichi: A Precious Promise'"
...not quite sure whether I'm to sigh dreamily or roll my eyes at that one.
Again though, this is testament to an element of PTE's genius; it's making you feel conflicted because it's convincing and familiar on first glance but you know that it is satire and overdone on another level. Moreover, the fact that the plot was essentially told through next episode previews speaks to just how overdone these literary elements are. The creation of something new through destruction, the destruction being a form of mockery of tried-and-true, established formulas of the past: this is a quintessential attitude of the Postmodern artist. Some could argue that the result is 'low brow', or that it is in a sense, a cop-out because as we all know, it's generally much easier to destroy than it is to create. It's one of the reasons why every other person is a critic and few are creators. So Postmodern art is generally an invalid, talentless, tasteless product. While I will agree with this, there truly are some hacks that tout their work as 'art' but in reality aren't interested in sincere artistic enterprise, one should be careful not to overgeneralize, unless one wishes to miss out on extracting value from the work that contains significance, that does hold some degree of artistic merit, unorthodox as it may appear. Now, separating the chaff from the wheat, why that's a difficult process to navigate simply because of the misdirection and highly subjective nature of interpretation. As several of my favorite textbooks used to say, that 'is an exercise left for the reader.'.
We're sort of losing the script here. As a reminder, the Postmodern tradition really is a continuation of the reductionist trend of Modernism, which sought to determine what is the essence of art via systemic elimination of elements. Likewise, PTE explores the same idea through the elimination stylistic continuity, traditional plot structure, and the reverent status of other works and the anime medium itself, via satire/self-reference/irony. In my mind, this is why the series is so polarizing: it isn't exactly clear what the hell it is.
"My sweet, simple 2B. Either you're far too easily impressed or you're giving this shitpost of a show way too much credit. It isn't really anything special. Satire, self-reference, breaking the fourth wall has been around forever, and there are numerous films, series, books, etc that poke fun at other things in a cynical manner." That's true, in recent history there has been. But prior to the 1950s, it really wasn't prevalent; Postmodernism popularized it. In the decades since then, media has gotten much more saturated with breaking the fourth wall, parody, self-reference, etc. It only seems ordinary to most of us by now because we were born and steeped in this kind of artistic and cultural environment. So ingrained are these practices that even these once-pioneering themes and methodologies are becoming overdone and passé themselves. Remember how surprising it was when, in Metal Gear Solid (The Twin Snakes), Psycho Mantis could read off of the player's memory card and comment on your affinity towards Super Smash Bros. Melee? Over time, breaking the fourth wall has become a much more common occurrence; it isn't very difficult at all to think up of an example. Why, Doki Doki Literature Club, VA-11 HALL-A, and even NieR: Automata are fairly recent titles that come readily to mind.
And with that last idea, it is with a strange mixture of eager anticipation, horrified disgust, and a semi-open mind that I await to see what new elements will crop up in the art and cultural sphere. What new methodologies and themes will we be able to burn-out our aesthetic appetites on? It seems nearly impossible to imagine, as it appears everything has been already done before. However, if history does indeed follow a cyclical pattern I think it won't be too long before we find ourselves in a similar position as our predecessors of over a century ago.
[end transmission 3/3]
20190903
[begin transmission]
Dear You,
It's overcast out; in a place where the sun is shining (if not burning) for nearly 14/7/365, today comes slightly unexpectedly. Maybe this unease is an indicator that I'm finally getting used to my surroundings. Or maybe it's the holiday from work making me feel particularly useless. Who's to say? In any case, melancholy or not, I told you that I would give you my thoughts on current developments between us. I'd been so caught up in day-to-day affairs that I hadn't been afforded the time to give it the focused attention it deserves, but I intend to make good on my promise now.
First, let's say it outright. You lied. You lied to an entire community, you lied to those closest to you. You lied to me. Just to be clear it isn't my intention to shame you into oblivion; I couldn't think of a more nonsensical and stupid act, since it only serves to demoralize and defeat you. What possible use could I have for a defeated you? What possible use could you have for a defeated you? But I will say this: I am judging you. Others in the know are judging you as well. They're assessing you as a person and how you stack up against your own purported ideals, against their own ideals, and are performing the necessary calculus to determine whether you are someone worthwhile or not. Of course, I can't speak for the others (I can estimate, given what I'm aware of), but I can speak with certainty about what I think.
And right now, I can say with certainty that I'm uncertain. I'm torn. Right now, I am not quite sure how to proceed. With that admission, I apologize if I've been difficult for the past couple of weeks, if I've been unusually cold or particularly warm towards you. It's simply because I'm trying to suss out how to approach you, my own feelings, and the feasibility of continuing our relationship.
A large part of my hesitation stems from a violation of credibility. Given that you've told falsehoods for so long, about non-trivial matters, what guarantee do I have that you will not do it again? Especially considering the fact that I've given you several opportunities in the past to come clean when I detected inconsistencies, only to have you lie to me again while swearing up and down that you're being absolutely truthful. Those opportunities were not to be taken lightly or for granted. I do not give passes frivolously. I am saying this with zero animosity towards you, I am saying this without condemnation towards your character. Maybe you can be trusted afterall, but I am not sure if I can personally trust you again. We can be friendly towards each other, we can continue with operations as usual; I'd like that very much. But when it comes to more personal matters, there will always be an inkling of doubt in my mind as to the veracity of your claims. Taking into account how you outright took my first and even second earnest attempts of reconciliation in bad faith, I think that my confidence in you is permanently damaged. If we are to continue our relationship, that would simply have to be an accepted nuisance to bear.
Remember how I had mentioned that I wished to get to know you? That process is now complicated by your actions and is no longer guaranteed. That's an opportunity that you've robbed yourself and me of.
I'm sure I've hinted to you as much before, but I do harbor some bitterness towards you over all of this. The most obvious cause of it is due to the sheer amount of my own time and effort (though let us not forget that of others) that you had wasted. It's upsetting to think how much attention was spent deliberating on matters that were actually non-existent, and the opportunity cost incurred from not being able to address other (some of them critical) issues at the time. These losses suffered are made exceptionally hard to assume when I think about the nature of lying and its implications. It is a tremendous indication of lack of regard towards the intelligence and agency of the person you're lying to. The implication here is something like this: you do not respect the people you are lying to enough to give them the correct information for them to operate on and come to their own decisions. Instead, you think that you can somehow bend and warp the truth of reality to fit your own purposes, to affect their decision-making capabilities to suit your own ends. Effectively, you are reducing everyone you're telling a lie to to a means, degrading them from a person to mere tool or process. The bitterness is only magnified whenever I think about how many times you've told me you've respected me or others, or claimed to care for any of us. A final multiplier to all of this is the massive amount of ego and arrogance that comes with each lie. What else could characterize someone--who thinks that they can take on reality and selectively edit it for their gain--other than arrogance? Reality wins out in the end, no matter what.
Reading back on what I had written, the philosophical implications of lying make the tone much more severe than I had intended. Make no mistake, lying is a great offense but this resentment I harbor towards you has been steadily diminishing as I'm slowly coming towards acceptance of the insults. YoRHa units do not cry over spilt milk. I attribute much of this cooling off towards reflections on my own misdeeds, on my own lies. I can certainly try to understand why people lie and recognize that it can be due to a series of complex motivational factors. That's something that I'd like to hear from you at some point: your motivations. I don't expect you to get back to me on that anytime soon; we might not ever arrive at a tidy, singular answer in fact. I can accept that because living in unresolved tension is a fundamental condition of existence. I'm not sure if others can accept silence on your part and they will insist on an answer (even if it isn't fully thought-out or accurate).
On that note, let us address the others. Some of the people you lied to may not care much at all. Some of them might care quite a bit. How much they care is a function of how close they are to you and how easily they forgive. I've told you that I would not tell anyone about your indiscretions and I intend to uphold that promise. I pledged to do this partially because I wish to preserve some of your honor, but also because I'm not responsible for cleaning up your mess. Now, those that are convinced of a concept known as a 'lie by omission' could argue that by not bringing this truth to light, I'm now an accomplice and lying to everyone else as well. See how much less lying can make of you and the people around you? Anyway, I'm not entirely convinced by the notion of lying by omission, and as I've said before, it is not my responsibility to fix your mistakes. That burden is solely yours: you choose who you'd like to come clean to and to what depth. And the process should be tortuous, it should be difficult; all the more reason why I shouldn't spare you of it with my own intervention. I do, however, recommend that you confess to the people you truly do care about and value with a readiness to accept that your relationship with them may fundamentally change for the better or for worse.
None of this was meant to provide you with comfort nor cause additional distress, I am only telling you were I currently stand. Reading this, I do hope that you retain some composure, towards this end I'll summarize a few takeaways:
- As far as you and I are concerned, we're not through. Though I'd be lying if I said that our dynamic is going to remain the same. If you insist on keeping me in your life, you're going to have to accept some changes.
- You have some work to do, determining who you'd like to come clean to and then actually having those difficult conversations. I suggest going in with the mindset of expecting potentially good or bad changes.
- No more lying. It doesn't do us any good.
It's still overcast, but I want to end this on a more positive note. I'd be remiss if I failed to remind you that you and I have history together, and that it counts for something. It's my firm belief that Lunar wouldn't have stood for this long without you. You've been there every step of the way, helping me in whichever manner that you could. It isn't lost on me, not for one second. Even if my demeanor might come off as cold or even short as I might get frustrated with your personality traits (I'm sure mine frustrate you), I've never once forgotten and never will forget just how much I am indebted to you.
In so many words, I'd like to keep you around.
-2B
[end transmission]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)